Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTUX vs RGAHX
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BFTUX vs RGAHX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth R6
Price$69.84
Change+$1.15 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets771.96M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.17
Change+$0.65 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTUX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. BFTUX (772M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BFTUX: RGAHX (0.45) vs BFTUX (0.00). BFTUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BFTUX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BFTUX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BFTUX (26.00) and RGAHX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTUX: RGAHX (250) vs BFTUX (5000000). BFTUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.70 vs. RGAHX (14.91). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 42.99 vs. BFTUX (39.30).
| BFTUX | RGAHX | BFTUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.44 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.840 | 20.057 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 772M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.70 | 14.91 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 133.20 | 76.57 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.30 | 42.99 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement