Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTUX vs RGAHX
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BFTUX vs RGAHX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth R6
Price$68.42
Change+$1.37 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets771M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$85.18
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTUX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. BFTUX (771M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BFTUX: RGAHX (0.44) vs BFTUX (0.00). BFTUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BFTUX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BFTUX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BFTUX (26.00) and RGAHX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTUX: RGAHX (250) vs BFTUX (5000000). BFTUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. RGAHX (7.06). BFTUX return over 5 years is better than : 40.73 vs. RGAHX (34.78).
| BFTUX | RGAHX | BFTUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.44 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.445 | 15.986 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 771M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.25 | 7.06 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 132.50 | 63.22 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.73 | 34.78 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement