Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTUX vs RGAHX
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BFTUX vs RGAHX
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTUX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BFTUX (791M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BFTUX: RGAHX (0.40) vs BFTUX (0.00). BFTUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BFTUX (11 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). BFTUX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BFTUX (19.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTUX: RGAHX (250) vs BFTUX (5000000). BFTUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. RGAHX (0.18). BFTUX return over 5 years is better than : 25.36 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| BFTUX | RGAHX | BFTUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.44 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.218 | 9.200 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 791M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.63 | 0.18 | 7,034% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.90 | 43.47 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.36 | 13.78 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 300.33 | 106.68 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement