Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGAFX vs CNPAX
BGAFX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts BGAFX vs CNPAX
Baron Global Advantage Retail
Price$43.76
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets642.4M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.42
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
BGAFX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGAFX vs. CNPAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGAFX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. BGAFX (642M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than BGAFX: CNPAX (0.48) vs BGAFX (0.00). BGAFX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: BGAFX (13 years) vs CNPAX (24 years). BGAFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGAFX (8.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGAFX: CNPAX (250) vs BGAFX (2000). BGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.31 vs. CNPAX (13.57). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.09 vs. BGAFX (5.85).
| BGAFX | CNPAX | BGAFX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.77 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.77 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.046 | 15.386 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 642M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.31 | 13.57 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.77 | 35.29 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.85 | 39.09 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 210.54 | 95.36 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement