Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGAFX vs CNPAX
BGAFX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts BGAFX vs CNPAX
BGAFX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGAFX vs. CNPAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGAFX is a Buy and CNPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. BGAFX (1.3B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than BGAFX: CNPAX (0.95) vs BGAFX (0.00). BGAFX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: BGAFX (14 years) vs CNPAX (25 years). BGAFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BGAFX (9.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGAFX: CNPAX (250) vs BGAFX (2000). BGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.62 vs. CNPAX (8.03). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.34 vs. BGAFX (4.68).
| BGAFX | CNPAX | BGAFX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.74 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.74 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.923 | 7.734 | 296% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 166B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.62 | 8.03 | 469% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.08 | 39.90 | 276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.68 | 11.34 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 318.85 | 115.95 | 275% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers