Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGAFX vs NPFFX
BGAFX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts BGAFX vs NPFFX
BGAFX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGAFX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGAFX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. BGAFX (1.21B). NPFFX pays higher dividends than BGAFX: NPFFX (0.92) vs BGAFX (0.00). BGAFX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: BGAFX (14 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). BGAFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BGAFX (9.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGAFX: NPFFX (250) vs BGAFX (2000). BGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.13 vs. NPFFX (3.25). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. BGAFX (-5.46).
| BGAFX | NPFFX | BGAFX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.77 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.77 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.046 | 3.058 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 170B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.13 | 3.25 | 649% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.49 | 31.46 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.46 | 9.71 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 282.70 | 102.42 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement