BGC
Price
$8.49
Change
-$0.06 (-0.70%)
Updated
Apr 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
21 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$84.98
Change
-$0.72 (-0.84%)
Updated
Apr 16, 12:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.95B
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGC vs SF

Header iconBGC vs SF Comparison
Open Charts BGC vs SFBanner chart's image
BGC Group
Price$8.49
Change-$0.06 (-0.70%)
Volume$2.41M
Capitalization3.84B
Stifel Financial
Price$84.98
Change-$0.72 (-0.84%)
Volume$121
Capitalization7.95B
BGC vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGC vs. SF commentary
Apr 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a StrongBuy and SF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BGC: $8.49 vs. SF: $85.70)
Brand notoriety: BGC and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 79% vs. SF: 138%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $3.84B vs. SF: $7.95B
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.84B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGC is a better buy in the long-term than SF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than BGC.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.85% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +12.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +132.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.76% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($7.95B) has a higher market cap than BGC($3.84B). BGC has higher P/E ratio than SF: BGC (109.29) vs SF (18.06). BGC YTD gains are higher at: -6.099 vs. SF (-18.860). SF has less debt than BGC: SF (1.18B) vs BGC (1.34B). SF has higher revenues than BGC: SF (4.29B) vs BGC (1.98B).
BGCSFBGC / SF
Capitalization3.84B7.95B48%
EBITDA215MN/A-
Gain YTD-6.099-18.86032%
P/E Ratio109.2918.06605%
Revenue1.98B4.29B46%
Total Cash656MN/A-
Total Debt1.34B1.18B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7977
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2622
SMR RATING
1..100
578
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9769
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGC's Valuation (37) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (26) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (57) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

BGC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SF (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (97) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOVZ9.680.05
+0.52%
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bd ETF
ERY26.800.08
+0.30%
Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X ETF
LGRO30.740.06
+0.19%
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF
SPTI28.450.04
+0.14%
SPDR® Portfolio Intmdt Term Trs ETF
DBA26.14-0.14
-0.53%
Invesco DB Agriculture

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
-0.70%
EVR - BGC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
PIPR - BGC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
GS - BGC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
MS - BGC
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
SF - BGC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More