Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FCHKX
BGCDX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FCHKX
BGCDX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. BGCDX (2.73M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: BGCDX (1.03) vs FCHKX (0.69). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: BGCDX (5 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). BGCDX (8.47) is less costly to investors than FCHKX (1.92). FCHKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. BGCDX (13.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FCHKX (250) vs BGCDX (10000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.29 vs. BGCDX (4.06). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 49.41 vs. BGCDX (-16.83).
| BGCDX | FCHKX | BGCDX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.92 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 8.47 | 1.92 | 441% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.168 | 31.934 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73M | 2.58B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.69 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 52.29 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.57 | 133.57 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.83 | 49.41 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 178.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement