Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKAX
BGCDX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKAX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$6.98
Change+$0.05 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.15M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$50.24
Change+$0.64 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
BGCDX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. BGCDX (3.15M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: BGCDX (1.57) vs FHKAX (0.97). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). FHKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKAX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.80 vs. FHKAX (43.86).
| BGCDX | FHKAX | BGCDX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.18 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 1.18 | 911% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.595 | 29.301 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.15M | 1.39B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.97 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.80 | 43.86 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.09 | 59.62 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 7.42 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement