Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKAX
BGCDX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKAX
BGCDX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. BGCDX (3.03M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than BGCDX: FHKAX (1.18) vs BGCDX (1.02). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: BGCDX (5 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). BGCDX (8.47) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). FHKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. BGCDX (13.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKAX (250) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.27 vs. BGCDX (22.62).
| BGCDX | FHKAX | BGCDX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.17 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 8.47 | 1.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.723 | 36.177 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.03M | 2.72B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.18 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.62 | 82.27 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.21 | 133.19 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 34.15 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 236.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement