Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKIX
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKIX
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. BGCDX (3.03M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than BGCDX: FHKIX (1.37) vs BGCDX (1.02). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: BGCDX (5 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). BGCDX (8.47) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). FHKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. BGCDX (13.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKIX (250) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.77 vs. BGCDX (22.62).
| BGCDX | FHKIX | BGCDX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.89 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 8.47 | 0.89 | 952% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.723 | 36.345 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.03M | 2.72B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.37 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.62 | 82.77 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.21 | 135.22 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 36.20 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 242.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MOPAX | 36.51 | 0.28 | +0.77% |
| NYLI WMC Small Companies Class A | |||
| MGGPX | 34.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp A | |||
| SBHSX | 15.73 | N/A | N/A |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret | |||
| HFDTX | 21.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R5 | |||
| RGLJX | 31.05 | N/A | N/A |
| American Funds Global Insight R-5E | |||