Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKIX
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKIX
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. BGCDX (2.81M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than BGCDX: FHKIX (1.37) vs BGCDX (1.02). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: BGCDX (5 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). BGCDX (8.47) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). FHKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. BGCDX (13.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKIX (250) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 79.76 vs. BGCDX (13.97).
| BGCDX | FHKIX | BGCDX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.89 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 8.47 | 0.89 | 952% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.913 | 39.363 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81M | 2.72B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.37 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.97 | 79.76 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.01 | 142.26 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 39.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 260.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers