Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKTX
BGCDX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKTX
BGCDX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. BGCDX (2.7M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: BGCDX (1.04) vs FHKTX (0.93). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: BGCDX (5 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). BGCDX (8.47) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). FHKTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. BGCDX (13.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKTX (250) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.23 vs. BGCDX (11.03). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.49 vs. BGCDX (-31.83).
| BGCDX | FHKTX | BGCDX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.43 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 8.47 | 1.43 | 592% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.780 | 32.727 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7M | 2.78B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.93 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.03 | 64.23 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.06 | 117.92 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.83 | 32.49 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 204.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers