Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs JMNAX
BGCKX vs JMNAX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs JMNAX
BGCKX vs JMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. JMNAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and JMNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. JMNAX (368M). BGCKX pays higher dividends than JMNAX: BGCKX (8.89) vs JMNAX (2.89). BGCKX was incepted earlier than JMNAX: BGCKX (10 years) vs JMNAX (24 years). JMNAX (2.87) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). JMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BGCKX (113.00). JMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: JMNAX (1000) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.55 vs. JMNAX (-3.60). BGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 82.25 vs. JMNAX (25.77).
| BGCKX | JMNAX | BGCKX / JMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.62 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 2.87 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.015 | -3.159 | -380% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.3B | 368M | 3,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.89 | 2.89 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.55 | -3.60 | -599% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.30 | 17.00 | 419% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.25 | 25.77 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.90 | 11.44 | 908% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement