Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs JMNAX
BGCKX vs JMNAX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs JMNAX
BGCKX vs JMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. JMNAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and JMNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 13.6B vs. JMNAX (349M). BGCKX pays higher dividends than JMNAX: BGCKX (6.29) vs JMNAX (2.85). BGCKX was incepted earlier than JMNAX: BGCKX (10 years) vs JMNAX (24 years). JMNAX (2.87) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). JMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BGCKX (44.00). JMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: JMNAX (1000) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.11 vs. JMNAX (-2.21). BGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 77.01 vs. JMNAX (27.15).
| BGCKX | JMNAX | BGCKX / JMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.62 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 2.87 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.451 | -2.747 | -380% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 349M | 3,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 2.85 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.11 | -2.21 | -863% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.16 | 17.40 | 409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.01 | 27.15 | 284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.58 | 12.91 | 795% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement