Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs JMNCX
BGCKX vs JMNCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs JMNCX
BGCKX vs JMNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. JMNCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and JMNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 13.5B vs. JMNCX (348M). BGCKX pays higher dividends than JMNCX: BGCKX (6.29) vs JMNCX (2.69). BGCKX was incepted earlier than JMNCX: BGCKX (10 years) vs JMNCX (17 years). JMNCX (3.29) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). JMNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BGCKX (44.00). JMNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: JMNCX (1000) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.88 vs. JMNCX (-2.61). BGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 76.35 vs. JMNCX (23.70).
| BGCKX | JMNCX | BGCKX / JMNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 3.03 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 3.29 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.314 | -2.980 | -346% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.5B | 348M | 3,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 2.69 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.88 | -2.61 | -722% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.22 | 15.65 | 455% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 23.70 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.72 | 3.93 | 2,611% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers