Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs JMNCX
BGCKX vs JMNCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs JMNCX
BGCKX vs JMNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. JMNCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and JMNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 14.1B vs. JMNCX (368M). BGCKX pays higher dividends than JMNCX: BGCKX (6.29) vs JMNCX (2.69). BGCKX was incepted earlier than JMNCX: BGCKX (10 years) vs JMNCX (17 years). JMNCX (3.29) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). JMNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BGCKX (113.00). JMNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: JMNCX (1000) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.40 vs. JMNCX (-3.61). BGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 81.57 vs. JMNCX (21.66).
| BGCKX | JMNCX | BGCKX / JMNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 3.03 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 3.29 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.160 | -3.608 | -337% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 368M | 3,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 2.69 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.40 | -3.61 | -648% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.49 | 14.71 | 493% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.57 | 21.66 | 377% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.36 | 2.54 | 4,104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement