Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs JMNSX
BGCKX vs JMNSX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs JMNSX
BGCKX vs JMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. JMNSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and JMNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. JMNSX (370M). BGCKX pays higher dividends than JMNSX: BGCKX (6.29) vs JMNSX (2.81). BGCKX was incepted earlier than JMNSX: BGCKX (10 years) vs JMNSX (17 years). JMNSX (2.58) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). JMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BGCKX (113.00). JMNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: JMNSX (1000000) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.73 vs. JMNSX (-2.00). BGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 77.99 vs. JMNSX (28.88).
| BGCKX | JMNSX | BGCKX / JMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.33 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 2.58 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.339 | -2.540 | -446% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 370M | 3,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 2.81 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.73 | -2.00 | -1,036% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.26 | 18.16 | 398% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.99 | 28.88 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.60 | 17.91 | 584% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement