Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs JMNSX
BGCKX vs JMNSX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs JMNSX
BGCKX vs JMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. JMNSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and JMNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. JMNSX (368M). BGCKX pays higher dividends than JMNSX: BGCKX (8.89) vs JMNSX (2.85). BGCKX was incepted earlier than JMNSX: BGCKX (10 years) vs JMNSX (17 years). JMNSX (2.58) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). JMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BGCKX (113.00). JMNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: JMNSX (1000000) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.55 vs. JMNSX (-3.35). BGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 82.25 vs. JMNSX (27.62).
| BGCKX | JMNSX | BGCKX / JMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.33 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 2.58 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.015 | -3.048 | -394% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.3B | 368M | 3,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.89 | 2.85 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.55 | -3.35 | -643% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.30 | 18.05 | 395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.25 | 27.62 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.90 | 16.39 | 634% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement