Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs JMNSX
BGCKX vs JMNSX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs JMNSX
BGCKX vs JMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. JMNSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and JMNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. JMNSX (331M). BGCKX pays higher dividends than JMNSX: BGCKX (8.79) vs JMNSX (2.87). BGCKX was incepted earlier than JMNSX: BGCKX (10 years) vs JMNSX (17 years). JMNSX (2.58) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.25). JMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BGCKX (113.00). JMNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: JMNSX (1000000) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.41 vs. JMNSX (-3.43). BGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 89.49 vs. JMNSX (27.87).
| BGCKX | JMNSX | BGCKX / JMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.33 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.58 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.492 | -3.302 | -439% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.6B | 331M | 4,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.79 | 2.87 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.41 | -3.43 | -479% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.14 | 15.84 | 462% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.49 | 27.87 | 321% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.61 | 16.09 | 694% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement