Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs QMNNX
BGCKX vs QMNNX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs QMNNX
BGCKX vs QMNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. QMNNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and QMNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. QMNNX (2.97B). BGCKX pays higher dividends than QMNNX: BGCKX (6.27) vs QMNNX (1.34). BGCKX was incepted earlier than QMNNX: BGCKX (10 years) vs QMNNX (12 years). QMNNX (6.31) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). QMNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 338.00 vs. BGCKX (44.00). QMNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCKX: QMNNX (2500) vs BGCKX (5000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.93 vs. QMNNX (4.14). QMNNX return over 5 years is better than : 116.81 vs. BGCKX (77.90).
| BGCKX | QMNNX | BGCKX / QMNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 6.31 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 6.31 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.022 | -5.246 | -229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 2.97B | 427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.27 | 1.34 | 467% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.93 | 4.14 | 457% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.87 | 72.41 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.90 | 116.81 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 45.36 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement