Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCKX vs QMNRX
BGCKX vs QMNRX Comparison
Open Charts BGCKX vs QMNRX
BGCKX vs QMNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCKX vs. QMNRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCKX is a Hold and QMNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGCKX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. QMNRX (2.86B). BGCKX pays higher dividends than QMNRX: BGCKX (6.29) vs QMNRX (1.61). BGCKX was incepted earlier than QMNRX: BGCKX (10 years) vs QMNRX (12 years). QMNRX (5.91) is less costly to investors than BGCKX (1.31). QMNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 338.00 vs. BGCKX (113.00). BGCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than QMNRX: BGCKX (5000000) vs QMNRX (50000000). BGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.73 vs. QMNRX (3.44). QMNRX return over 5 years is better than : 125.36 vs. BGCKX (77.99).
| BGCKX | QMNRX | BGCKX / QMNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 5.91 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 5.91 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.339 | -8.194 | -138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 50000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 2.86B | 486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 1.61 | 392% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.73 | 3.44 | 602% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.26 | 62.60 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.99 | 125.36 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.60 | 45.68 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement