Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGFRX vs CGFAX
BGFRX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BGFRX vs CGFAX
BGFRX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGFRX vs. CGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGFRX is a Hold and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BGFRX (224M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BGFRX: CGFAX (0.23) vs BGFRX (0.00). BGFRX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BGFRX (7 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BGFRX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). BGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGFRX: CGFAX (250) vs BGFRX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.47 vs. BGFRX (-7.08). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.54 vs. BGFRX (-24.74).
| BGFRX | CGFAX | BGFRX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.989 | 6.338 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.08 | 8.47 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.45 | 44.92 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.74 | 15.54 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement