Advertisement
BGFV vs HNST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGFV is a StrongBuy and HNST is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHNST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BGFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HNST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BGFV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BGFV (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +3.33% price change this week, while HNST (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGFV is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
HNST is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+1.10% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Household/Personal Care (+0.28% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| BGFV | HNST | BGFV / HNST | |
| Capitalization | 80.3M | 388M | 21% |
| EBITDA | 8.18M | -36.15M | -23% |
| Gain YTD | -30.726 | -25.541 | 120% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.84 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 885M | 344M | 257% |
| Total Cash | 9.2M | 32.8M | 28% |
| Total Debt | 277M | 29.8M | 930% |
BGFV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BGFV | HNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 85% |
Advertisement
BGFV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGFV has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGFV jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGFV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGFV | 100% | +5.08% | ||
| HNST - BGFV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| LE - BGFV | 44% Loosely correlated | -10.63% | ||
| CPRT - BGFV | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ONEW - BGFV | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.27% | ||
| DUFRY - BGFV | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||
HNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNST has been loosely correlated with GRWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNST jumps, then GRWG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNST | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| GRWG - HNST | 56% Loosely correlated | +10.28% | ||
| RH - HNST | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
| FND - HNST | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| CHPT - HNST | 54% Loosely correlated | +10.37% | ||
| LESL - HNST | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
More | ||||