It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKMX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BGFV (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +9.20% price change this week, while KMX (@Specialty Stores) price change was +5.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.35%.
BGFV is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
KMX is expected to report earnings on Dec 19, 2024.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
BGFV | KMX | BGFV / KMX | |
Capitalization | 80.3M | 13.8B | 1% |
EBITDA | 8.18M | 1.61B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -71.160 | -0.391 | 18,203% |
P/E Ratio | 29.84 | 27.46 | 109% |
Revenue | 885M | 26.6B | 3% |
Total Cash | 9.2M | 605M | 2% |
Total Debt | 277M | 19.5B | 1% |
BGFV | KMX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGFV's Valuation (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMX (79). This means that BGFV’s stock grew significantly faster than KMX’s over the last 12 months.
BGFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as KMX (100). This means that BGFV’s stock grew similarly to KMX’s over the last 12 months.
KMX's SMR Rating (79) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (94). This means that KMX’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
KMX's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (64). This means that KMX’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
BGFV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMX (40). This means that BGFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMX’s over the last 12 months.
BGFV | KMX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago81% | 8 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGFV has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGFV jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGFV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BGFV | 100% | -4.30% | ||
HNST - BGFV | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
LE - BGFV | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
CPRT - BGFV | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
ASO - BGFV | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
KMX - BGFV | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMX has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMX jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.