Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs RGFTX
BGLAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs RGFTX
BGLAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a StrongBuy and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 615M vs. BGLAX (126M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: RGFTX (3.10) vs BGLAX (1.34). BGLAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: BGLAX (15 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). BGLAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). BGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: RGFTX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. BGLAX (-8.51). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 24.73 vs. BGLAX (5.11).
| BGLAX | RGFTX | BGLAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.22 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.335 | 10.965 | 112% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 126M | 615M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 3.10 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.51 | 9.11 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.99 | 35.94 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.11 | 24.73 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement