Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGRFX vs FSMAX
BGRFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BGRFX vs FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
BGRFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGRFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGRFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. BGRFX (5.85B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BGRFX: FSMAX (0.46) vs BGRFX (0.00). BGRFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BGRFX (31 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BGRFX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. BGRFX (0.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGRFX: FSMAX (0) vs BGRFX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. BGRFX (-12.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. BGRFX (-9.78).
| BGRFX | FSMAX | BGRFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.871 | 4.478 | -198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.85B | 39.6B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.93 | 21.74 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.66 | 37.63 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.78 | 51.34 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.02 | 81.66 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement