Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGRFX vs FSMAX
BGRFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BGRFX vs FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
BGRFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGRFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGRFX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. BGRFX (4.91B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BGRFX: FSMAX (0.44) vs BGRFX (0.00). BGRFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BGRFX (31 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BGRFX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. BGRFX (0.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGRFX: FSMAX (0) vs BGRFX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. BGRFX (-23.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.18 vs. BGRFX (-16.57).
| BGRFX | FSMAX | BGRFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.179 | 11.730 | -104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 41.4B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.05 | 17.85 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.91 | 68.00 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.57 | 50.18 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.32 | 104.77 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers