Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGRUX vs FSMAX
BGRUX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BGRUX vs FSMAX
BGRUX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGRUX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGRUX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. BGRUX (2.09B). BGRUX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: BGRUX (0.90) vs FSMAX (0.48). BGRUX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BGRUX (10 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BGRUX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BGRUX (1.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGRUX: FSMAX (0) vs BGRUX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. BGRUX (-34.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. BGRUX (-50.47).
| BGRUX | FSMAX | BGRUX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.070 | 13.698 | -95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 43.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.48 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | -34.04 | 20.08 | -170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.80 | 58.16 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.47 | 33.56 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.01 | 132.04 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers