Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGRWX vs CGFAX
BGRWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BGRWX vs CGFAX
BGRWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGRWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGRWX is a Hold and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BGRWX (21.8M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BGRWX: CGFAX (0.23) vs BGRWX (0.00). BGRWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BGRWX (28 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BGRWX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BGRWX (8.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGRWX: CGFAX (250) vs BGRWX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. BGRWX (-1.48). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. BGRWX (-12.34).
| BGRWX | CGFAX | BGRWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.62 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.62 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.409 | 8.708 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.48 | 11.97 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.83 | 48.15 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.34 | 18.99 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.20 | 122.58 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement