BGS
Price
$3.88
Change
+$0.10 (+2.65%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
306.81M
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLF
Price
$12.25
Change
+$0.12 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.26B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGS vs HLF

BGS vs HLF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. HLF commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a StrongBuy and HLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BGS: $3.78 vs. HLF: $12.13)
Brand notoriety: BGS and HLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 116% vs. HLF: 112%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $306.81M vs. HLF: $1.26B
BGS [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $306.81M. HLF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $2.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLF is a better buy in the long-term than BGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLF is a better buy in the short-term than BGS.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while HLF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

HLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.50% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLF($1.26B) has a higher market cap than BGS($307M). HLF YTD gains are higher at: -5.896 vs. BGS (-8.691). HLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 625M vs. BGS (140M). HLF has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. BGS (64.5M). BGS has less debt than HLF: BGS (2.06B) vs HLF (2.18B). HLF has higher revenues than BGS: HLF (5.13B) vs BGS (1.81B).
BGSHLFBGS / HLF
Capitalization307M1.26B24%
EBITDA140M625M22%
Gain YTD-8.691-5.896147%
P/E RatioN/A5.32-
Revenue1.81B5.13B35%
Total Cash64.5M451M14%
Total Debt2.06B2.18B94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs HLF: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
HLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
964
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as HLF (31) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's SMR Rating (4) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for BGS (96) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BGS (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (51) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSVVX16.36N/A
N/A
LSV Conservative Value Equity
CSGCX46.62N/A
N/A
Calvert Balanced C
CFSLX13.04N/A
N/A
Column Small Cap
JCONX33.28-0.06
-0.18%
Janus Henderson Contrarian I
RLBAX40.37-0.13
-0.32%
American Funds American Balanced R1