CENT
Price
$33.30
Change
-$0.14 (-0.42%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
47 days until earnings call
HLF
Price
$7.14
Change
+$0.03 (+0.42%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CENT vs HLF

Header iconCENT vs HLF Comparison
Open Charts CENT vs HLFBanner chart's image
Central Garden & Pet
Price$33.30
Change-$0.14 (-0.42%)
Volume$121.17K
CapitalizationN/A
Herbalife
Price$7.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.42%)
Volume$1.25M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CENT vs HLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CENT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CENT vs. HLF commentary
Oct 10, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CENT is a Buy and HLF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2024
Stock price -- (CENT: $33.31 vs. HLF: $7.14)
Brand notoriety: CENT and HLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CENT: 88% vs. HLF: 73%
Market capitalization -- CENT: $2.69B vs. HLF: $1B
CENT [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.69B. HLF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CENT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CENT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLF is a better buy in the long-term than CENT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CENT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CENT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CENT and HLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CENT (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.34% price change this week, while HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +4.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CENT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

HLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.46% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CENT($2.69B) has a higher market cap than HLF($1B). CENT has higher P/E ratio than HLF: CENT (20.91) vs HLF (6.42). CENT YTD gains are higher at: -16.908 vs. HLF (-53.211). HLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 482M vs. CENT (319M). HLF has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. CENT (341M). CENT has less debt than HLF: CENT (1.38B) vs HLF (2.77B). HLF has higher revenues than CENT: HLF (5.06B) vs CENT (3.32B).
CENTHLFCENT / HLF
Capitalization2.69B1B268%
EBITDA319M482M66%
Gain YTD-16.908-53.21132%
P/E Ratio20.916.42326%
Revenue3.32B5.06B66%
Total Cash341M575M59%
Total Debt1.38B2.77B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CENT vs HLF: Fundamental Ratings
CENT
HLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
727
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7984
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7929
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLF's Valuation (67) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CENT (80) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to CENT’s over the last 12 months.

CENT's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Consumer Sundries industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CENT (72) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CENT’s over the last 12 months.

CENT's Price Growth Rating (79) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as HLF (84) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CENT (79) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CENT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CENTHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CENT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL229.543.77
+1.67%
Apple
SPY577.143.97
+0.69%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME20.50-0.21
-1.01%
GameStop Corp
TSLA241.05-3.45
-1.41%
Tesla
BTC.X60582.100000-1549.867200
-2.49%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

CENT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENT has been closely correlated with CENTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CENT jumps, then CENTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CENT
1D Price
Change %
CENT100%
-0.39%
CENTA - CENT
98%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
USNA - CENT
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
DAR - CENT
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
INDFY - CENT
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NOMD - CENT
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
More

HLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLF
1D Price
Change %
HLF100%
+0.42%
USNA - HLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
CENTA - HLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CENT - HLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
CAG - HLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
FRPT - HLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
More