BGS
Price
$7.30
Change
-$0.44 (-5.68%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:08 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
NOMD
Price
$17.09
Change
-$0.22 (-1.27%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:25 PM (EDT)
71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGS vs NOMD

Header iconBGS vs NOMD Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs NOMDBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$7.30
Change-$0.44 (-5.68%)
Volume$392
CapitalizationN/A
Nomad Foods
Price$17.09
Change-$0.22 (-1.27%)
Volume$306
CapitalizationN/A
BGS vs NOMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. NOMD commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a StrongBuy and NOMD is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BGS: $7.74 vs. NOMD: $17.30)
Brand notoriety: BGS and NOMD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 120% vs. NOMD: 96%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $899.46M vs. NOMD: $3.21B
BGS [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $899.46M. NOMD’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the long-term than NOMD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOMD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOMD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the short-term than NOMD.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +1.18% price change this week, while NOMD (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

NOMD is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.93% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOMD($3.21B) has a higher market cap than BGS($899M). BGS has higher P/E ratio than NOMD: BGS (25.71) vs NOMD (16.07). NOMD YTD gains are higher at: 5.559 vs. BGS (-21.653). NOMD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 480M vs. BGS (173M). NOMD has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. BGS (41.1M). BGS (2.12B) and NOMD (2.15B) have identical debt. NOMD has higher revenues than BGS: NOMD (3.04B) vs BGS (2.06B).
BGSNOMDBGS / NOMD
Capitalization899M3.21B28%
EBITDA173M480M36%
Gain YTD-21.6535.559-390%
P/E Ratio25.7116.07160%
Revenue2.06B3.04B68%
Total Cash41.1M413M10%
Total Debt2.12B2.15B99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs NOMD: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
NOMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5772
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NOMD (21) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NOMD (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

NOMD's SMR Rating (77) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (90) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

NOMD's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as NOMD (72) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSNOMD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMTFX94.65-0.74
-0.78%
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
CFNEX89.84-0.75
-0.83%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529E
RMQHX578.87-4.86
-0.83%
Rydex Monthly Rbl NASDAQ-100® 2x Strt H
WHGAX21.20-0.32
-1.49%
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund A
QBNAX35.55-1.28
-3.48%
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with RKDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then RKDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
+1.04%
RKDA - BGS
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.84%
BYND - BGS
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
HLF - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
CENTA - BGS
31%
Poorly correlated
+6.03%
NOMD - BGS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More

NOMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOMD has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOMD jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOMD
1D Price
Change %
NOMD100%
-0.35%
FLO - NOMD
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
GCHOY - NOMD
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CENTA - NOMD
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.03%
CENT - NOMD
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
KHC - NOMD
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More