Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGSAX vs SCICX
BGSAX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts BGSAX vs SCICX
BGSAX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGSAX vs. SCICX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGSAX is a Hold and SCICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. BGSAX (7.84B). BGSAX pays higher dividends than SCICX: BGSAX (1.14) vs SCICX (0.00). BGSAX was incepted earlier than SCICX: BGSAX (26 years) vs SCICX (27 years). SCICX (1.91) is less costly to investors than BGSAX (1.19). BGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). BGSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: BGSAX (1000) vs SCICX (2000). SCICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.81 vs. BGSAX (21.11). BGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.98 vs. SCICX (4.41).
| BGSAX | SCICX | BGSAX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.91 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.872 | 51.291 | 35% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.84B | 28.7B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.11 | 45.81 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.95 | 50.95 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.98 | 4.41 | 748% |
| Returns for 10 years | 377.66 | 66.20 | 571% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement