Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGVCX vs FMDRX
BGVCX vs FMDRX Comparison
Open Charts BGVCX vs FMDRX
BGVCX vs FMDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGVCX vs. FMDRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGVCX is a Hold and FMDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.64B vs. BGVCX (86.4M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than BGVCX: FMDRX (1.74) vs BGVCX (0.90). BGVCX was incepted earlier than FMDRX: BGVCX (14 years) vs FMDRX (13 years). BGVCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). FMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.28 vs. BGVCX (31.32). BGVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: BGVCX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). BGVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. FMDRX (7.95). BGVCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.25 vs. FMDRX (15.18).
| BGVCX | FMDRX | BGVCX / FMDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.89 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 0.89 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.568 | 10.262 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.4M | 9.64B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.74 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 7.95 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.36 | 24.82 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.25 | 15.18 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.62 | 26.60 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers