Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGVCX vs FMDRX
BGVCX vs FMDRX Comparison
Open Charts BGVCX vs FMDRX
BGVCX vs FMDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGVCX vs. FMDRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGVCX is a Hold and FMDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. BGVCX (82.3M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than BGVCX: FMDRX (1.82) vs BGVCX (1.03). BGVCX was incepted earlier than FMDRX: BGVCX (13 years) vs FMDRX (13 years). BGVCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). FMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.28 vs. BGVCX (0.68). BGVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: BGVCX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). BGVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.17 vs. FMDRX (2.64). BGVCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.07 vs. FMDRX (4.32).
| BGVCX | FMDRX | BGVCX / FMDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.89 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 0.89 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.843 | 0.437 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.3M | 8.98B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.82 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 2.64 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.98 | 15.24 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.07 | 4.32 | 719% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.83 | 24.77 | 375% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers