BH
Price
$342.51
Change
-$0.76 (-0.22%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.05B
23 days until earnings call
CHA
Price
$16.66
Change
+$0.40 (+2.46%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BH vs CHA

Header iconBH vs CHA Comparison
Open Charts BH vs CHABanner chart's image
Biglari Holdings
Price$342.51
Change-$0.76 (-0.22%)
Volume$634
Capitalization1.05B
Chagee Holdings
Price$16.66
Change+$0.40 (+2.46%)
Volume$8.89K
Capitalization3.02B
BH vs CHA Comparison Chart in %
BH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BH vs. CHA commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BH is a Buy and CHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BH: $343.27 vs. CHA: $16.26)
Brand notoriety: BH and CHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BH: 63% vs. CHA: 132%
Market capitalization -- BH: $1.05B vs. CHA: $3.02B
BH [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.05B. CHA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BH is a better buy in the long-term than CHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHA is a better buy in the short-term than BH.

Price Growth

BH (@Restaurants) experienced а +6.06% price change this week, while CHA (@Restaurants) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

BH is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.73% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHA($3.02B) has a higher market cap than BH($1.05B). CHA has higher P/E ratio than BH: CHA (21.75) vs BH (11.88). CHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.37B vs. BH (98.2M). CHA has more cash in the bank: 8.86B vs. BH (137M). BH has less debt than CHA: BH (125M) vs CHA (749M). CHA has higher revenues than BH: CHA (13.6B) vs BH (377M).
BHCHABH / CHA
Capitalization1.05B3.02B35%
EBITDA98.2M2.37B4%
Gain YTD34.992N/A-
P/E Ratio11.8821.7555%
Revenue377M13.6B3%
Total Cash137M8.86B2%
Total Debt125M749M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BH vs CHA: Fundamental Ratings
BH
CHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1756
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
7943
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4182
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
829
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BH's Valuation (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CHA (90) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that BH’s stock grew similarly to CHA’s over the last 12 months.

BH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHA (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that BH’s stock grew significantly faster than CHA’s over the last 12 months.

CHA's SMR Rating (43) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BH (79) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BH’s over the last 12 months.

BH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHA (82) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that BH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHA’s over the last 12 months.

BH's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CHA (29) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that BH’s stock grew similarly to CHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHCHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSWWX27.31N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Y
RMQCX607.82N/A
N/A
Rydex Monthly Rbl NASDAQ-100® 2x Strt C
MCIMX23.96N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value C
GTCAX27.85N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Content & Connect A
JDMNX152.46N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Enterprise N

CHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHA and BH have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHA and BH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHA
1D Price
Change %
CHA100%
-2.87%
BH - CHA
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
BDL - CHA
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
CMG - CHA
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
WEN - CHA
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
FATBB - CHA
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
More