Advertisement
CHA vs CMG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHA is a StrongBuy and CMG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CHA (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.66% price change this week, while CMG (@Restaurants) price change was -6.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-3.48% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| CHA | CMG | CHA / CMG | |
| Capitalization | 2.15B | 39.2B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 1.1B | 2.31B | 47% |
| Gain YTD | -3.267 | -17.459 | 19% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.30 | 28.02 | 55% |
| Revenue | 13.1B | 12.1B | 108% |
| Total Cash | 7.92B | 869M | 912% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 5.25B | 26% |
CHA | CMG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 70 | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHA's Valuation (12) in the Major Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMG (80) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CHA’s stock grew significantly faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.
CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CHA (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to CHA’s over the last 12 months.
CMG's SMR Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHA (56) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHA’s over the last 12 months.
CHA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CMG (62) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CHA’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.
CHA's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CMG (88) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CHA’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.
| CHA | CMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 62% | 9 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ILS | 20.01 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | |||
| FLRG | 40.63 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | |||
| OVF | 32.45 | N/A | -0.01% |
| Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF | |||
| DHDG | 36.42 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF | |||
| IBDX | 25.06 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF | |||
CHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHA and LOCO have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHA and LOCO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHA | 100% | -3.43% | ||
| LOCO - CHA | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.74% | ||
| BROS - CHA | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.22% | ||
| BJRI - CHA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CAKE - CHA | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| CMG - CHA | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.00% | ||
More | ||||
CMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMG | 100% | -6.00% | ||
| FRSH - CMG | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| SG - CMG | 53% Loosely correlated | -7.25% | ||
| CAVA - CMG | 48% Loosely correlated | -9.31% | ||
| CAKE - CMG | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| BJRI - CMG | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||