Ad is loading...
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. BHCFX (162M). BHCFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCFX (0.22) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCFX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.55 vs. FSPHX (-11.31). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.91 vs. FSPHX (-11.47).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.63 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.109 | -7.229 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162M | 6.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.02 | 1,235% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.55 | -11.31 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.11 | 5.18 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.91 | -11.47 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...