Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. BHCFX (147M). BHCFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCFX (0.23) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCFX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). FSPHX (-11.12) and BHCFX (-11.43) have marching annual gain over last year. BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.67 vs. FSPHX (-9.99).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.214 | -5.982 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 5.86B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.02 | 1,258% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.43 | -11.12 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.64 | 4.97 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.67 | -9.99 | -287% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement