Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. BHCFX (134M). BHCFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCFX (0.22) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCFX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.73 vs. FSPHX (-14.01). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.64 vs. FSPHX (-11.62).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.265 | -1.028 | 318% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 5.88B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.02 | 1,264% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.73 | -14.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 2.06 | 401% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.64 | -11.62 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers