Ad is loading...
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. BHCFX (218M). BHCFX (0.00) and FSPHX (0.00) have matching dividends . BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (7 years) vs FSPHX (43 years). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. BHCFX (4.07). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.89 vs. FSPHX (4.02).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.961 | 3.095 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 7.51B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | 5.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.92 | -8.43 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.89 | 4.02 | 1,243% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.13 | - |