Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. BHCFX (107M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: FSPHX (0.45) vs BHCFX (0.00). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (8 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHCFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.40 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.63 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.711 | -14.447 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 5.78B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | -2.88 | -398% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.73 | -14.19 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.40 | -23.32 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement