Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Hold and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. BHCFX (104M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: FSPHX (0.42) vs BHCFX (0.00). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (8 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHCFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.67 vs. FSPHX (7.89). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.65 vs. FSPHX (-18.25).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.62 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.831 | -3.753 | -102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 6.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.67 | 7.89 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | -3.29 | -521% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.65 | -18.25 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers