Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. BHCFX (102M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: FSPHX (0.39) vs BHCFX (0.00). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (8 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHCFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.81 vs. FSPHX (6.37). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.19 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.62 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.843 | 1.524 | 384% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 102M | 6.75B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.81 | 6.37 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.80 | 4.93 | 463% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.19 | -15.45 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement