Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCHX vs FSPHX
BHCHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCHX vs. FSPHX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. BHCHX (162M). BHCHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCHX (0.51) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCHX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCHX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCHX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCHX (1000000). BHCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.94 vs. FSPHX (-14.20). BHCHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.93 vs. FSPHX (-14.75).
| BHCHX | FSPHX | BHCHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.138 | -9.174 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162M | 6.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.02 | 2,921% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.94 | -14.20 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.90 | -2.27 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.93 | -14.75 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement