Ad is loading...
BHCHX vs FSPHX
BHCHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. BHCHX (170M). BHCHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCHX (0.50) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCHX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCHX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). BHCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.83 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCHX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCHX (1000000). BHCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.16 vs. FSPHX (-13.51). BHCHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.10 vs. FSPHX (-0.27).
| BHCHX | FSPHX | BHCHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.65 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.65 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.152 | -5.651 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 6.42B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 3,008% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.16 | -13.51 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.37 | -10.53 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.10 | -0.27 | -16,587% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...