Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCHX vs FSPHX
BHCHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. BHCHX (141M). BHCHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCHX (0.53) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCHX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCHX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCHX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCHX (1000000). BHCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.01 vs. FSPHX (-13.02). BHCHX return over 5 years is better than : 15.73 vs. FSPHX (-19.49).
| BHCHX | FSPHX | BHCHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.827 | -7.670 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 5.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.02 | 3,000% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.01 | -13.02 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.41 | -10.77 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.73 | -19.49 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers