Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCHX vs FSPHX
BHCHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. BHCHX (147M). BHCHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHCHX (0.54) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHCHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCHX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCHX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCHX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCHX (1000000). BHCHX (-11.26) and FSPHX (-11.63) have marching annual gain over last year. BHCHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.38 vs. FSPHX (-10.17).
| BHCHX | FSPHX | BHCHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.061 | -6.165 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 5.86B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.02 | 2,975% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.26 | -11.63 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.26 | 9.95 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.38 | -10.17 | -299% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers