Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCHX vs FSPHX
BHCHX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHCHX vs FSPHX
BHCHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. BHCHX (110M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCHX: FSPHX (0.41) vs BHCHX (0.00). BHCHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCHX (8 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHCHX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). BHCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCHX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCHX (1000000). BHCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.14 vs. FSPHX (6.33). BHCHX return over 5 years is better than : 3.05 vs. FSPHX (-18.89).
| BHCHX | FSPHX | BHCHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.62 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.62 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.096 | -3.542 | -116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 6.37B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.14 | 6.33 | 381% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.64 | -3.52 | -473% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.05 | -18.89 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement