BHF
Price
$63.49
Change
+$0.44 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.65B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BHFAM
Price
$10.74
Change
-$0.05 (-0.46%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHF vs BHFAM

BHF vs BHFAM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHF vs. BHFAM commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHF is a Buy and BHFAM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BHF: $63.05 vs. BHFAM: $10.79)
Brand notoriety: BHF and BHFAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHF: 90% vs. BHFAM: 163%
Market capitalization -- BHF: $3.62B vs. BHFAM: $0
BHF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.62B. BHFAM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $17.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBHFAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BHFAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHF is a better buy in the long-term than BHFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHFAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BHFAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHF is a better buy in the short-term than BHFAM.

Price Growth

BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while BHFAM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHFAM YTD gains are higher at: 2.890 vs. BHF (-2.686). BHF (3.15B) and BHFAM (3.15B) have identical debt. BHF (5.53B) and BHFAM (5.53B) have equivalent revenues.
BHFBHFAMBHF / BHFAM
Capitalization3.65BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.6862.890-93%
P/E Ratio10.99N/A-
Revenue5.53B5.53B100%
Total Cash87.4BN/A-
Total Debt3.15B3.15B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHF: Fundamental Ratings
BHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFBHFAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BHFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSMC28.890.04
+0.12%
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
FTCA7.40N/A
N/A
Franklin California Municipal Income ETF
CMBS48.48-0.08
-0.17%
iShares CMBS ETF
XME115.22-1.72
-1.47%
Stt Strt®SPDR®S&P®Mtls &MngETF
PGJ23.05-0.36
-1.54%
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been loosely correlated with GNW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then GNW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
-0.32%
GNW - BHF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
BHFAO - BHF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
LNC - BHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
BHFAP - BHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
BHFAN - BHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More

BHFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHFAM has been closely correlated with BHFAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHFAM jumps, then BHFAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHFAM
1D Price
Change %
BHFAM100%
-0.28%
BHFAN - BHFAM
91%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
BHFAP - BHFAM
83%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
BHFAO - BHFAM
83%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
BHF - BHFAM
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
PUK - BHFAM
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More