BHF
Price
$52.01
Change
-$0.10 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
27 days until earnings call
PWCDF
Price
$38.36
Change
+$0.24 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
18.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHF vs PWCDF

Header iconBHF vs PWCDF Comparison
Open Charts BHF vs PWCDFBanner chart's image
Brighthouse Financial
Price$52.01
Change-$0.10 (-0.19%)
Volume$564.88K
Capitalization3.21B
Power Corp. of Canada
Price$38.36
Change+$0.24 (+0.63%)
Volume$35.16K
Capitalization18.61B
BHF vs PWCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHF vs. PWCDF commentary
Jul 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHF is a Hold and PWCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2025
Stock price -- (BHF: $52.01 vs. PWCDF: $38.36)
Brand notoriety: BHF and PWCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHF: 70% vs. PWCDF: 58%
Market capitalization -- BHF: $3.21B vs. PWCDF: $18.61B
BHF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.21B. PWCDF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $18.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWCDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PWCDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWCDF is a better buy in the long-term than BHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWCDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWCDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWCDF is a better buy in the short-term than BHF.

Price Growth

BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -3.29% price change this week, while PWCDF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-1.56% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWCDF($18.6B) has a higher market cap than BHF($3.21B). PWCDF has higher P/E ratio than BHF: PWCDF (18.90) vs BHF (4.80). PWCDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.949 vs. BHF (8.264). BHF has more cash in the bank: 86B vs. PWCDF (8.93B). BHF has less debt than PWCDF: BHF (3.16B) vs PWCDF (15.6B). PWCDF has higher revenues than BHF: PWCDF (64.8B) vs BHF (3.95B).
BHFPWCDFBHF / PWCDF
Capitalization3.21B18.6B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.26422.94936%
P/E Ratio4.8018.9025%
Revenue3.95B64.8B6%
Total Cash86B8.93B963%
Total Debt3.16B15.6B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHF vs PWCDF: Fundamental Ratings
BHF
PWCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5523
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4025
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9323
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PWCDF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (63) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

PWCDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as BHF (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PWCDF (99) in the null industry. This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to PWCDF’s over the last 12 months.

PWCDF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BHF (60) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

PWCDF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHF (93) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew significantly faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFPWCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSIFX46.83N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Z
GPIOX3.47N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak International Opps Inv
VSPGX901.68N/A
N/A
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Instl
WWSAX20.68N/A
N/A
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
CSGZX80.20N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
-0.19%
PRU - BHF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
CNO - BHF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
MET - BHF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
LNC - BHF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
UNM - BHF
68%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More

PWCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWCDF has been loosely correlated with MFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWCDF jumps, then MFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWCDF
1D Price
Change %
PWCDF100%
+0.64%
MFC - PWCDF
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
PRU - PWCDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
BHF - PWCDF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
LNC - PWCDF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
MET - PWCDF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
More