BHF
Price
$45.25
Change
-$0.70 (-1.52%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.68B
49 days until earnings call
UNM
Price
$76.26
Change
+$1.16 (+1.54%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.64B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHF vs UNM

Header iconBHF vs UNM Comparison
Open Charts BHF vs UNMBanner chart's image
Brighthouse Financial
Price$45.25
Change-$0.70 (-1.52%)
Volume$17.26K
Capitalization2.68B
Unum Group
Price$76.26
Change+$1.16 (+1.54%)
Volume$13.31K
Capitalization12.64B
BHF vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHF vs. UNM commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHF is a Hold and UNM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BHF: $45.91 vs. UNM: $75.10)
Brand notoriety: BHF and UNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHF: 75% vs. UNM: 95%
Market capitalization -- BHF: $2.68B vs. UNM: $12.64B
BHF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $2.68B. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $12.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $137.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the long-term than BHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the short-term than BHF.

Price Growth

BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -5.83% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

UNM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.54% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNM($12.6B) has a higher market cap than BHF($2.68B). UNM has higher P/E ratio than BHF: UNM (9.00) vs BHF (5.25). UNM YTD gains are higher at: 4.561 vs. BHF (-4.434). BHF has more cash in the bank: 87.5B vs. UNM (39.4B). BHF has less debt than UNM: BHF (3.16B) vs UNM (3.74B). UNM has higher revenues than BHF: UNM (12.8B) vs BHF (6.15B).
BHFUNMBHF / UNM
Capitalization2.68B12.6B21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.4344.561-97%
P/E Ratio5.259.0058%
Revenue6.15B12.8B48%
Total Cash87.5B39.4B222%
Total Debt3.16B3.74B84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHF vs UNM: Fundamental Ratings
BHF
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5982
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
534
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9637
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNM's Valuation (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (63). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (53). This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (95). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (63). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (96). This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NJUL70.630.02
+0.03%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Bfr ETF Jul
REAI20.01N/A
N/A
Intelligent Real Estate ETF
IBGK24.11N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Trsy ETF
FSYD48.80-0.02
-0.05%
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
ROBO65.06-0.44
-0.67%
Robo Global® Robotics&Automation ETF

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been closely correlated with LNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then LNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
-1.94%
LNC - BHF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
CNO - BHF
72%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
PRU - BHF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
MET - BHF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
PRI - BHF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
More

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been closely correlated with PRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then PRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
+1.20%
PRI - UNM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
MET - UNM
70%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
PRU - UNM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
GL - UNM
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
AFL - UNM
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More