It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHFAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHFAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BHFAP (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +4.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.09%.
CNO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
BHFAP | CNO | BHFAP / CNO | |
Capitalization | N/A | 2.96B | - |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -12.099 | 3.293 | -367% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 11.33 | - |
Revenue | 3.95B | 4.15B | 95% |
Total Cash | 86B | 21.6B | 398% |
Total Debt | 3.16B | 4.15B | 76% |
BHFAP | CNO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BHFAP's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNO (53) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that BHFAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNO’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHFAP (59) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's SMR Rating (98) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHFAP (100) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHFAP (77) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHFAP (100) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
BHFAP | CNO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago31% | 1 day ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago27% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago36% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago36% | 1 day ago47% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago40% | 4 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 11 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHFAP has been closely correlated with BHFAO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHFAP jumps, then BHFAO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHFAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BHFAP | 100% | +0.21% | ||
BHFAO - BHFAP | 82% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
BHFAM - BHFAP | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
BHFAN - BHFAP | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
LNC - BHFAP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
GNW - BHFAP | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.