Advertisement
BHFAP vs CNO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHFAP is a StrongBuy and CNO is a StrongBuy.
| BHFAP | CNO | BHFAP / CNO | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 5.08B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.116 | 30.810 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 18.94 | - |
| Revenue | 6.35B | 4.65B | 137% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.15B | 4.55B | 69% |
BHFAP | CNO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BHFAP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNO (53) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that BHFAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNO’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHFAP (100) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew significantly faster than BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHFAP (100) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHFAP (58) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHFAP (100) in the null industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew significantly faster than BHFAP’s over the last 12 months.
| BHFAP | CNO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 9 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHFAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while CNO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BHFAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CNO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHFAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BHFAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CNO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BHFAP (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-2.54% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BEX | 37.65 | 4.31 | +12.93% |
| Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | |||
| UBT | 14.47 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| IBGB | 23.02 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| VMBS | 45.32 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Secs ETF | |||
| JQC | 4.71 | -0.02 | -0.42% |
| Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | |||
BHFAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHFAP has been closely correlated with BHFAO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHFAP jumps, then BHFAO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHFAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHFAP | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| BHFAO - BHFAP | 92% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| BHFAN - BHFAP | 90% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| BHFAM - BHFAP | 87% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BHF - BHFAP | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CNO - BHFAP | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||