BHP
Price
$57.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
111 days until earnings call
FCX
Price
$46.73
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BHP vs FCX

Header iconBHP vs FCX Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs FCXBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$57.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.71M
CapitalizationN/A
Freeport-McMoran
Price$46.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.45M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BHP vs FCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BHP vs. FCX commentary
Oct 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a StrongBuy and FCX is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 30, 2024
Stock price -- (BHP: $57.12 vs. FCX: $46.73)
Brand notoriety: BHP and FCX are both notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 65% vs. FCX: 56%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $146.11B vs. FCX: $67.89B
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $146.11B. FCX’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $67.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFCX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FCX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the long-term than BHP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the short-term than BHP.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($146B) has a higher market cap than FCX($67.9B). FCX has higher P/E ratio than BHP: FCX (36.98) vs BHP (20.02). FCX YTD gains are higher at: 11.164 vs. BHP (-11.843). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.6B vs. FCX (8.59B). BHP has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. FCX (4.76B). FCX has less debt than BHP: FCX (9.85B) vs BHP (22.4B). BHP has higher revenues than FCX: BHP (55.3B) vs FCX (22.9B).
BHPFCXBHP / FCX
Capitalization146B67.9B215%
EBITDA22.6B8.59B263%
Gain YTD-11.84311.164-106%
P/E Ratio20.0236.9854%
Revenue55.3B22.9B241%
Total Cash10.6B4.76B223%
Total Debt22.4B9.85B227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs FCX: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
FCX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2120
SMR RATING
1..100
10065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1727
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (5) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FCX (16) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHP (21) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (65) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHP (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHP (55) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FCX (27) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPFCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.732.16
+10.50%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X69907.7600001978.460900
+2.91%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL233.401.99
+0.86%
Apple
SPY580.831.79
+0.31%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA262.51-6.68
-2.48%
Tesla

FCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCX has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCX jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCX
1D Price
Change %
FCX100%
+0.28%
SCCO - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
HBM - FCX
83%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
LUNMF - FCX
79%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
GLNCY - FCX
76%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
TECK - FCX
75%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More