It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUSAS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.77% price change this week, while USAS (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.
BHP is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
USAS is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
BHP | USAS | BHP / USAS | |
Capitalization | 146B | 52.2M | 279,693% |
EBITDA | 22.6B | -10.37M | -217,957% |
Gain YTD | -21.288 | 41.535 | -51% |
P/E Ratio | 20.02 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 55.3B | 84.9M | 65,135% |
Total Cash | 10.6B | 890K | 1,191,011% |
Total Debt | 22.4B | 18M | 124,444% |
BHP | USAS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BHP's Valuation (4) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAS (50) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAS’s over the last 12 months.
BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for USAS (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than USAS’s over the last 12 months.
USAS's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that USAS’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.
USAS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHP (73) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that USAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.
BHP's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for USAS (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than USAS’s over the last 12 months.
BHP | USAS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago67% | 20 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BHP | 100% | -0.22% | ||
RIO - BHP | 88% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
FCX - BHP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
VALE - BHP | 78% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
GLNCY - BHP | 74% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
HBM - BHP | 74% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAS has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAS jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USAS | 100% | -5.90% | ||
AAGFF - USAS | 43% Loosely correlated | -12.47% | ||
VZLA - USAS | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.84% | ||
PRMNF - USAS | 41% Loosely correlated | -9.01% | ||
RIO - USAS | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.45% | ||
BHP - USAS | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
More |