BHSIF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
9.24M
DCNNF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHSIF vs DCNNF

Header iconBHSIF vs DCNNF Comparison
Open Charts BHSIF vs DCNNFBanner chart's image
Bayhorse Silver
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$229.47K
Capitalization9.24M
QUEST CRITICAL METALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$597.5K
Capitalization1.7M
BHSIF vs DCNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHSIF vs. DCNNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSIF is a Hold and DCNNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BHSIF: $0.03 vs. DCNNF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: BHSIF and DCNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHSIF: 107% vs. DCNNF: 48%
Market capitalization -- BHSIF: $9.24M vs. DCNNF: $1.7M
BHSIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.24M. DCNNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHSIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDCNNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHSIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DCNNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BHSIF and DCNNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHSIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DCNNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHSIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DCNNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DCNNF is a better buy in the short-term than BHSIF.

Price Growth

BHSIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.44% price change this week, while DCNNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSIF($9.24M) has a higher market cap than DCNNF($1.7M). DCNNF YTD gains are higher at: -38.176 vs. BHSIF (-49.367). DCNNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -469.51K vs. BHSIF (-3.1M). BHSIF has more cash in the bank: 153K vs. DCNNF (88.9K). DCNNF has less debt than BHSIF: DCNNF (400K) vs BHSIF (438K). BHSIF (0) and DCNNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BHSIFDCNNFBHSIF / DCNNF
Capitalization9.24M1.7M542%
EBITDA-3.1M-469.51K660%
Gain YTD-49.367-38.176129%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash153K88.9K172%
Total Debt438K400K110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHSIF vs DCNNF: Fundamental Ratings
BHSIF
DCNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5889
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DCNNF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (94). This means that DCNNF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

DCNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that DCNNF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

DCNNF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that DCNNF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

BHSIF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (89). This means that BHSIF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

BHSIF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that BHSIF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHSIFDCNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALTS4.390.52
+13.57%
ALT5 Sigma Corporation
SBLK19.310.20
+1.05%
Star Bulk Carriers Corp
JZ1.54N/A
N/A
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited
NDSN225.03-0.98
-0.43%
Nordson Corp
FATN5.86-0.29
-4.72%
FatPipe Inc.

BHSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHSIF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHSIF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHSIF
1D Price
Change %
BHSIF100%
-13.04%
DCNNF - BHSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-18.75%
NEXA - BHSIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
LITOF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
NVLHF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
NDMCF - BHSIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More