BHSIF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.71M
NDMCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
426.34K
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHSIF vs NDMCF

Header iconBHSIF vs NDMCF Comparison
Open Charts BHSIF vs NDMCFBanner chart's image
Bayhorse Silver
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.79K
Capitalization4.71M
New Destiny Mining
Price$0.03
Change-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization426.34K
BHSIF vs NDMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHSIF vs. NDMCF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSIF is a Hold and NDMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BHSIF: $0.03 vs. NDMCF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BHSIF and NDMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHSIF: 16% vs. NDMCF: 243%
Market capitalization -- BHSIF: $4.71M vs. NDMCF: $426.34K
BHSIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.71M. NDMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $426.34K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHSIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHSIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NDMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDMCF is a better buy in the long-term than BHSIF.

Price Growth

BHSIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.81% price change this week, while NDMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.56% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSIF($4.71M) has a higher market cap than NDMCF($426K). BHSIF YTD gains are higher at: -45.750 vs. NDMCF (-57.687). NDMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -129.78K vs. BHSIF (-2.37M). BHSIF has more cash in the bank: 87.2K vs. NDMCF (351). NDMCF has less debt than BHSIF: NDMCF (6.25K) vs BHSIF (453K). BHSIF (0) and NDMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BHSIFNDMCFBHSIF / NDMCF
Capitalization4.71M426K1,104%
EBITDA-2.37M-129.78K1,827%
Gain YTD-45.750-57.68779%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash87.2K35124,843%
Total Debt453K6.25K7,248%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHSIF: Fundamental Ratings
BHSIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWAIX12.270.08
+0.66%
Thrivent International Equity S
RIGEX42.650.14
+0.33%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R4
HSLIX41.53N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Growth I
SGTTX78.89N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst2
NOLVX21.30N/A
N/A
Northern Large Cap Value

BHSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHSIF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHSIF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHSIF
1D Price
Change %
BHSIF100%
N/A
DCNNF - BHSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEXA - BHSIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
LITOF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
MARIF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVLHF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-11.09%
More

NDMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDMCF has been loosely correlated with UURAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDMCF jumps, then UURAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDMCF
1D Price
Change %
NDMCF100%
N/A
UURAF - NDMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
LCGMF - NDMCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
NEXA - NDMCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
CCJ - NDMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
BHSIF - NDMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More