Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSRX (6.12B) and FSPHX (5.88B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BHSRX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHSRX (0.02) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (14 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHSRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.94 vs. BHSRX (-19.35). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.10 vs. BHSRX (-17.43).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.315 | -2.385 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.12B | 5.88B | 104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.35 | -16.94 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.15 | -2.44 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.43 | -15.10 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.49 | 17.50 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers