Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSRX has more cash in the bank: 6.41B vs. FSPHX (5.92B). BHSRX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHSRX (0.02) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (14 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHSRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. BHSRX (27.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.58 vs. BHSRX (-15.13). BHSRX return over 5 years is better than : -10.17 vs. FSPHX (-15.52).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.146 | -6.202 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.41B | 5.92B | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.13 | -13.58 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.72 | -1.90 | 458% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.17 | -15.52 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.87 | 4.69 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement