Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSRX has more cash in the bank: 6.46B vs. FSPHX (5.86B). BHSRX (0.02) and FSPHX (0.02) have matching dividends . BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (14 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHSRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. BHSRX (27.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.67 vs. BHSRX (-15.21). BHSRX return over 5 years is better than : -10.88 vs. FSPHX (-13.93).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.823 | -7.266 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 5.86B | 110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.21 | -12.67 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.80 | -1.50 | 719% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.88 | -13.93 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.10 | 8.04 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement