Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSRX has more cash in the bank: 6.58B vs. FSPHX (6.22B). BHSRX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHSRX (0.02) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (14 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHSRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. BHSRX (-0.88). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -8.84 vs. BHSRX (-9.52).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.63 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.63 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.428 | 10.532 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.58B | 6.22B | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | 0.02 | -5,198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.06 | 10.47 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.52 | -8.84 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.64 | 39.34 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement