Ad is loading...
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSRX (6.64B) and FSPHX (6.42B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BHSRX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: BHSRX (0.02) vs FSPHX (0.02). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (14 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHSRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BHSRX (27.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. BHSRX (-9.95). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -7.06 vs. BHSRX (-7.89).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.65 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.65 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.106 | -5.798 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 6.42B | 103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.95 | -8.31 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.70 | -9.31 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.89 | -7.06 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.29 | 8.14 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...