Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. BHSRX (6.21B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHSRX: FSPHX (0.39) vs BHSRX (0.10). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (15 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHSRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. BHSRX (43.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. BHSRX (6.44). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.00 vs. BHSRX (-19.50).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.62 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.677 | 3.810 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.21B | 6.75B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.39 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 10.35 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.93 | 9.03 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.50 | -14.00 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.01 | 46.34 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement