Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSRX (5.89B) and FSPHX (5.78B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHSRX: FSPHX (0.45) vs BHSRX (0.10). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (15 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHSRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. BHSRX (43.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). BHSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.55 vs. FSPHX (0.76). BHSRX return over 5 years is better than : -21.47 vs. FSPHX (-23.99).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.62 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.080 | -11.527 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.89B | 5.78B | 102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.45 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.55 | 0.76 | 468% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.41 | -10.88 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.47 | -23.99 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.38 | 37.35 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement