Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHSRX (6.32B) and FSPHX (6.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHSRX: FSPHX (0.42) vs BHSRX (0.10). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (15 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHSRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. BHSRX (43.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.35 vs. BHSRX (9.34). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.25 vs. BHSRX (-19.72).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.62 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.886 | 1.559 | -121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 6.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.42 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.34 | 11.35 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.26 | 3.32 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.72 | -13.25 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.46 | 40.28 | 63% |