Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts BHSRX vs FSPHX
BHSRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHSRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSRX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX (6.37B) and BHSRX (6.09B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHSRX: FSPHX (0.41) vs BHSRX (0.10). BHSRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHSRX (15 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHSRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. BHSRX (43.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHSRX: FSPHX (0) vs BHSRX (100). BHSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.83 vs. FSPHX (11.07). BHSRX return over 5 years is better than : -14.10 vs. FSPHX (-16.76).
| BHSRX | FSPHX | BHSRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.62 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.370 | -1.889 | -231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.09B | 6.37B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.41 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.83 | 11.07 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.87 | -2.58 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.10 | -16.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.23 | 38.60 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement