Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHYSX vs NCFCX
BHYSX vs NCFCX Comparison
Open Charts BHYSX vs NCFCX
BHYSX vs NCFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHYSX vs. NCFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHYSX is a Hold and NCFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHYSX has more cash in the bank: 27.6B vs. NCFCX (594M). BHYSX (6.37) and NCFCX (6.31) have matching dividends . BHYSX was incepted earlier than NCFCX: BHYSX (28 years) vs NCFCX (16 years). NCFCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than BHYSX (0.93). NCFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. BHYSX (64.00). NCFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHYSX: NCFCX (2500) vs BHYSX (5000). NCFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.36 vs. BHYSX (3.49). BHYSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.08 vs. NCFCX (18.41).
| BHYSX | NCFCX | BHYSX / NCFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.77 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.84 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.857 | 2.330 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.6B | 594M | 4,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.37 | 6.31 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.49 | 4.36 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.49 | 25.71 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.08 | 18.41 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.10 | 53.65 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement