Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHYSX vs NCOAX
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison
Open Charts BHYSX vs NCOAX
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHYSX vs. NCOAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHYSX is a Hold and NCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHYSX has more cash in the bank: 27.6B vs. NCOAX (594M). NCOAX pays higher dividends than BHYSX: NCOAX (7.05) vs BHYSX (6.37). BHYSX was incepted earlier than NCOAX: BHYSX (28 years) vs NCOAX (16 years). NCOAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than BHYSX (0.93). NCOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. BHYSX (64.00). NCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHYSX: NCOAX (2500) vs BHYSX (5000). NCOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. BHYSX (3.49). NCOAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.92 vs. BHYSX (21.08).
| BHYSX | NCOAX | BHYSX / NCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.02 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.09 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.857 | 2.832 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.6B | 594M | 4,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.37 | 7.05 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.49 | 5.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.49 | 28.48 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.08 | 22.92 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.10 | 65.67 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement