Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAFX vs GFACX
BIAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAFX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity I
Price$44.34
Change-$0.22 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
BIAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAFX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BIAFX (1.04B). BIAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BIAFX (0.23) vs GFACX (0.00). BIAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAFX (19 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BIAFX (0.68). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BIAFX (15.00). BIAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAFX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. BIAFX (9.54). BIAFX return over 5 years is better than : 68.57 vs. GFACX (39.11).
| BIAFX | GFACX | BIAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.577 | 17.158 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.54 | 15.58 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.21 | 53.17 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.57 | 39.11 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.31 | 82.02 | 238% |