Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAFX vs GFACX
BIAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAFX vs GFACX
BIAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAFX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BIAFX (980M). BIAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BIAFX (0.15) vs GFACX (0.00). BIAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAFX (20 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BIAFX (0.67). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BIAFX (17.00). BIAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAFX (100) vs GFACX (250). BIAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.60 vs. GFACX (-2.39). BIAFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.84 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| BIAFX | GFACX | BIAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.35 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.35 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.237 | 8.529 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | -2.39 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.17 | 34.46 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.84 | 3.85 | 800% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.36 | 82.33 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement