TRZPX has more cash in the bank: 929M vs. BIAHX (699M). TRZPX pays higher dividends than BIAHX: TRZPX (2.62) vs BIAHX (1.23). BIAHX was incepted earlier than TRZPX: BIAHX (13 years) vs TRZPX (6 years). BIAHX (1.20) is less costly to investors than TRZPX (0.84). TRZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.80 vs. BIAHX (47.00). TRZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIAHX: TRZPX (0) vs BIAHX (100). TRZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.73 vs. BIAHX (4.31). BIAHX return over 5 years is better than : 47.84 vs. TRZPX (12.00).

	BIAHX	TRZPX	BIAHX / TRZPX
Total Expense Ratio	1.20	0.00	-
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	1.20	0.84	143%
Fund Existence	13 years	6 years	-
Gain YTD	6.439	12.293	52%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	100	0	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	699M	929M	75%
Annual Yield % from dividends	1.23	2.62	47%
Returns for 1 year	4.31	6.73	64%
Returns for 3 years	71.14	31.72	224%
Returns for 5 years	47.84	12.00	399%
Returns for 10 years	97.26	N/A	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
IMEGX	27.71	0.56	+2.06%
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq R6
LCGFX	30.82	0.13	+0.42%
William Blair Large Cap Growth I
ISOPX	20.79	N/A	N/A
Voya SmallCap Opportunities Port A
FDECX	25.93	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development C
UUPSX	72.25	-0.22	-0.30%
ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Svc